Here’s an excerpt of the review of what sounds like a fascinating film:

Fernando and Marie give up their respective jobs as lawyer and writer for Marie Claire magazine and become intimately involved with Salvador Allende’s election in Chile. Soon, they have fired Filomena (the Cuban nanny), who hates Castro and all the “rojos barbudos” (bearded reds) responsible for taking her land back home and forcing her into exile, and they’ve withdrawn Anna (their daughter who grows fearful of her parents’ politics, and rightly so) from her religion class. As their apartment becomes increasingly invaded by activists who refer to her as their “pequeña momia,” Spanish for “little mummy,” which was what Chilean left-wingers called right-wingers at the time, Anna takes refuge in her bourgeois grandparents, who tell her it’s one thing to be polite to the poor and another to let them take one’s property.

But here’s my favorite part, sad though it may be:

When Anna, finally ready to concede to her parents, misinterprets their belief in group solidarity and answers a question incorrectly in class because everyone else answered incorrectly, her parents are stumped. What’s the difference between group solidarity and behaving like sheep?

But why should her parents be stumped? That is what communism is and has always been about: acting, being and thinking like a sheep, being one with the “collective” no matter how wrong the collective is.

Oopsie: the name of the film, of course, is “Blame It on Fidel.”

Share

As if we needed any more:

Democrat Christopher Dodd pledged Saturday that as president he would end a decades-old trade embargo with Cuba and lift travel restrictions to the communist island.

The Connecticut senator also said he would open an embassy in Havana and shut down the 17-year-old TV Marti, a U.S. government-run station that broadcasts to Cuba.

“Other than the war in Iraq, no other American policy is more broadly unpopular internationally,” Dodd said of American policy toward Cuba.

Memo to Chris Dodd: unless you’re running for president of the USELESS NATIONS, who gives a rat’s behind what is “unpopular internationally”?

Share

Answer: P-r-i-s-o-n-e-r r-e-l-e-a-s-e-s u-n-d-e-r R-a-ú-l C-a-s-t-r-o. That’s part of the headline (the whole thing reads Prisoner releases under Raúl Castro raise hope for Cuba) of a Christian Science Monitor piece that naively suggests the Castros do ANYTHING out of altruistic feelings:

The steady fall in Cuba’s political prisoner population since Raúl Castro took the reins of power in July 2006 is leading some Cuba experts to conclude that some kind of new day is dawning on the Caribbean communist island.

But at least one person knows the real deal:

The number still represents by far the largest incarceration of prisoners of conscience of any country in the Western Hemisphere and one of the highest per capita rates anywhere in the world – leading some analysts to doubt that anything in Cuba has really changed.

“Yes, they have released some political prisoners, some because they fulfilled their sentences or others because of their health, but that doesn’t translate into a real shift in the country,” says Jaime Suchlicki, director of the Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies at the University of Miami. “I don’t see any let-up in the repression in Cuba or [in] the harassment of the opposition people.”

Surprise, surprise, Castro apologist and colostomy bag changer Wayne Smith chimes in, blaming the U.S. and one George W. Bush for our bad relations with Cuba:

“The Bush administration’s nasty noises are part of the reason for things moving slowly,” says Mr. Smith, who was a longtime State Department Cuba specialist. “If ever anything positive came out of the US, I believe we could see much more rapid releases” of political prisoners.

In case you have no idea who Wayne Smith is, Google his name and you’ll find:

1-His articles posted on a bunch of left-wing moonbat websites.
2-His former boss? Jimmy Carter.

Nuff said.

Share
Aug 282007

Posthumous predictions from Castro today in Granma:

Today, talk is about the seemingly invincible ticket that might be created with Hillary for President and Obama for Vice President.

Something very telling in Castro’s posthumous musings: he likes Carter and Clinton:

OF all the presidents of the United States, and those who aspire to that office, I only met one who, for ethical-religious reasons, was not an accomplice to the brutal terrorism [sic] against Cuba: James Carter.

AND

Clinton was really kind when we informally crossed paths at a UN meeting attended by many heads of state. Moreover, he was friendly, as well as intelligent, in demanding adherence to the law in the case of the kidnapped boy, when he was rescued [sic] by special federal agents sent from Washington.

Yep, says a lot about you when one of the world’s worst dictators says nice things about you.

Share

That’s the headline of a brief item by Brazil correspondent Jonathan Wheatley of the Financial Times. Here’s the money quote:

It has been clear since last summer when the president’s younger brother, Raúl, smoothly took over the reins of power on a temporary basis that the institutions of Cuban communism were strong enough to survive Mr Castro’s departure from office.

Gawd, I hope he’s wrong. But in any event, Raul is old himself. Except that maybe when his turn comes up, he’ll say yes to the colostomy bag.

Share

Tomorrow (Monday) a big court date is set for the custody battle between the foster, and would be adoptive parents of a young Cuban girl in Miami, and her father from Cuba:

Nearly eight years after the battle over young Elian Gonzalez divided this city, another Cuban child has become the center of a bitter custody fight. A trial is set to begin Monday in family court over whether the 4-year-old girl’s father can regain custody of his daughter or whether she should remain with the wealthy Cuban-American former sports agent and his wife who want to adopt her.

We’ve mentioned this story before, as have numerous other blogs and websites. What makes this case especially interesting is the fact that the foster father was only recently revealed as Joe Cubas, a sports agent best known for representing defecting Cuban baseball stars. A few days ago, Babalu Blog posted that this was a case of revenge by Castro; I agree. Sure smells like it.

And here’s an interesting quote from today’s article, the one I’m posting about here:

Both (the girl’s mother, Elena) Perez and (head of the Cuba Study Group Carlos) Saladrigas said the community’s fear was that in both the Elian case and this one the fathers were pressured to bring the children back by the Castro government.

“The concern is whether they are speaking from their heart or being coerced, and there is no clear answer to that. You will never know,” Saladrigas said, adding, “If it wouldn’t be for that it would be a no-brainer.”

Funny how that got buried at the end of the article.

Share

Venezuela’s rubber-stamp congress moved closer to allowing Fidel Castro’s parrot, Hugo Chavez, to become dictator for life (or for a very long time at least). They gave the initial thumbs up to a series of so-called “reforms” that would allow Mini-Me, er, Chavez, to stay in office for a seven-year term rather than the current six years. Additionally, Chavez’s peanut gallery dropped presidential term limits.

The measures await final approval in about two to three months, then must be approved by simple majority via national referendum. But of course, we know how ethical Venezuelan elections have been since Chavez, ahem, defeated a recall measure.

Share

Obama, Obama, Obama. It takes more than a speech in Little Havana to endear yourself to Cuban-Americans. You’re already starting out with a handicap: you belong to the wrong political party. And now this?

”We regret that Sen. Obama has been so ill-advised as to assume that lifting sanctions against Cuba’s dictatorial regime will bring about change,” read a statement issued by the non-partisan Cuban Liberty Council. “It is sad that he does not apply the same principles used to bring about change in South Africa where blacks were victims of the same apartheid as Cubans on the island.”

He should listen to someone who knows what he’s talking about:

Dario Moreno, a Florida International University political science professor, said Obama’s position could cost him some votes.

”He’s appealing to the most progressive element of his party, and I think what he’s underestimating is the large number of Hispanics in Miami-Dade that he could alienate himself from,” Moreno said.

Share

Why Chávez, Castro bash U.S. ethanol plan

Share

Reporters are taught to question everything. That is, unless they’re dealing with Castro’s government:

Cuban President Fidel Castro is exercising daily and has regained the 40 pounds he lost after surgery last summer, and his health crisis is “definitely behind us,” Cuban Foreign Minister Felipe Perez Roque told Mexico’s daily newspaper Reforma.

And…

Perez denied that Cuba has any political prisoners, calling people now in jail on the island “mercenaries” working for the U.S. government and imprisoned for their actions, not “for their ideas,” the newspaper said.

Yes, of course. Let’s just repeat anything the Castro government says verbatim, okay? Without questioning the source or even making a pretend effort to find out the truth.

Only two explanations for this:

-Lazy reporting
-Fellow traveler of Fidel Castro

Hard to say which one I’d put money on. For all I know, it might be a combination of both.

Share
© 2011 Castro Death Watch Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha