The Socialist government of Spain wants to relive the days of concentration camps and the like for Cuba. But a group of bloggers called Bloggers United for Cuban Liberty is doing everything it can to expose José Luís Rodríguez Zapatero and his ilk:

The Spanish government is being denounced by Bloggers United for Cuban Liberty (http://bucl.org) in a new advertising campaign aimed at educating the public about oppression in Castro’s Cuba.

The multimedia campaign, unveiled today, consists of bus shelter panels that target areas near the Spanish consulate and the Spanish Cultural Center, both in Coral Gables, Florida. An online component, launching today, will steer readers searching for certain information about Cuba and Spain to BUCL.org.

“This effort marks the first of several coordinated activities aimed at exposing those countries, companies and institutions that aid and abet the Castro regime in oppressing the Cuban people,” said Henry Gomez, the spokesman for Bloggers United for Cuban Freedom. Gomez continues:

“Spanish businesses are dealing directly with the Castro regime and are helping perpetuate Cuba’s totalitarian system by complying with that country’s unfair labor laws and enforcing an apartheid system in which Cubans are not allowed to use the same facilities as tourists. From the Spanish perspective, there is no reason to pursue change in Cuba, they are benefiting from exploitation of Cuban workers and would like to see the status quo perpetuated.”

The Socialist Spanish government of José Luís Rodríguez Zapatero has been leading an effort to normalize relations between the European Union and Cuba. Those relations have been strained since the Castro regime’s crackdown on and jailing of 75 dissidents and independent journalists in 2003. In April of this year, Spain’s foreign minister Miguel Angel Moratinos visited Cuba and met with Raul Castro, while noticeably snubbing Cuban dissidents that had requested a meeting with him.

“It’s important for the Spanish government and business interests to know that freedom-loving Cubans will not forget who conspired with the Castro brothers and against their liberty when the inevitable fall of the dictatorship comes,” said Val Prieto, editor of BabaluBlog.com and member of Bloggers United for Cuban Liberty.

BUCL’s campaign has been covered by local, national and even international media.

Meanwhile, the guys at Babalu Blog have posted the video of a commercial by Spain’s Iberia Airlines. The commercial depicts two Cuban women of African descent as being at the whims of a baby who wins a free trip to Cuba. To say the commercial is both sexist and racist is to say that the sun is a little warm. No word yet on whether Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton plan to organize any boycotts of Spain or Iberia Airlines.

Share
 

While the usual cast of leftist useful idiot apologists for Castro hold their rallies and fruitcake fests to protest a judge’s ruling that Luis Posada Carriles–a man who had already been acquitted in Venezuela for what they accuse him of–should be freed, they conveniently ignore Castro’s allowing numerous fugitives from U.S. justice to live in Cuba. We’re talking about people accused of, and in some cases actually CONVICTED of, serious crimes, folks, such as murder of law enforcement officers and hijacking. Listed below are a few:

  • Charlie Hill, accused murderer, admitted hijacker
  • Joanne Chesimard (AKA Assata Shakur), who has a $1 million bounty on her head for escaping prison after actually being convicted in the killing of a New Jersey state trooper
  • Guillermo Morales, arrested on bomb-making charges after a bomb he made blew up in his apartment, blowing off the fingers of one of his own hands
  • Ralph Goodwin, accomplice of Charlie Hill, died in Cuba
  • Michael Finney, another accomplice of Charlie Hill who also died in Cuba
  • William Lee Brent, accused of a hijacking, died in Cuba

As is standard with leftists, if someone proclaims themselves to be against the U.S., then they’re automatically innocent of the most heinous crimes–but if they did do it, they were “justified.” That’s the mentality of these people: politics comes first, the ends justify the means.

And the converse is true: if you’re against left-wing dictators (such as Castro), then anything the left-wing dictatorship accuses you of is automatically true, and you should be executed without benefit of trial, never mind that leftists are usually the first ones to demand a fair trial and are supposedly against the death penalty. Apparently, those principles only apply to their fellow travelers.

Don’t forget any of this when you read the fawning puff pieces about left-wing radical criminals in the sympathetic MSM.

A hat tip to Babalu Blog for bringing up this issue.

Share
 

Just when we thought the issue of how Castro manipulates his life expectancy numbers to make Cuba look better than it really is, had been settled

Along comes some Canuck news outfit parroting the Castro talking points:

Fidel Castro may be ailing, but he’s a living example of something Cubans take pride in – an average life expectancy roughly similar to that of people in the United States. They ascribe it to free medical care, a mild climate, and a low-stress Caribbean lifestyle, which they believe make up for the hardships and shortages they suffer.

“Sometimes you have all you want to eat and sometimes you don’t,” said Raquel Naring, a 70-year-old retired gas station attendant. “But there aren’t elderly people sleeping on the street like other places.”

Sounds like food is optional in Castro’s fantasy land, eh?

Share
 

There’s a nice piece written by Alberto De La Cruz, posted on Claudia Fanelli’s blog, titled The Tribe of Cuba. Here’s an excerpt:

The philosophical difference experienced between Cuban exiles and Latino immigrants is vast and appears insurmountable; no matter of discussion or name-calling will change the respective positions. Other Latinos will always view Cuban exiles as the redheaded stepchildren of Latin America—out of place and out of step. One common notion that is expressed on a regular basis by non-Cuban Latinos in news shows, editorial pages, and internet blogs, to name a few, is that Cuban exiles are the remnants of the deposed fascist Cuban dictator, Fulgencio Batista, and that they only want to return the island to its right-wing past as a pseudo-colony of the United States. Those that believe and espouse such nonsense are not only poor students of Cuban history, but also fail to see the absurdity in such a notion. Dictatorships, be they on the right or left, are oppressive by nature and regardless of what their foreign supporters and collaborators may think and proclaim, never enjoy a loyal following from their own masses. The only loyalty a dictator can expect—without the convincing help of a rifle—comes from the ones who are complicit with the dictatorship and benefit from it. In Cuba, however, not only did Batista and his accomplices leave the island, but so did many others, including doctors, artists, lawyers, taxi drivers, professors, clerks, factory workers, and members of every other social and economic class. Over one million Cubans have fled the island since January of 1959 and to assert that these exiles, who represent the complete social and economic spectrum of that nation, were all collaborators with Batista’s dictatorship shows at best an all-encompassing ignorance of history and at worst, a complicity with the murderous regime.

Enjoy the whole thing here.

Share
 

Gotta love Italians.

One in particular–photographer Oliviero Toscani–has opened a new exhibition at the European Union’s parliament building. The exhibit, titled “Forbidden To Think: The Faces Of Cuban Repression,” features huge photos of imprisoned Cuban political dissidents:

“I’m not here to create virtuoso photographs,” (Toscani) said. “In this exhibit, art consists of action applied to the human condition. It is always an honour to work on an issue linked to human rights.”

According to the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats in the European Parliament (ALDE), which helped organize the exhibit, it is intended to draw attention to a group of intellectuals arrested in March 2003.

Seventy-five people were charged with treason and political conspiracy, some of whom received sentences of up to 28 years.

Despite international pressure, only 14 have been released for health-related reasons while the rest remain in jail.

The European Union imposed sanctions for a brief period in the wake of the arrests but later abandoned these in favour of dialogue.

ALDE says the exhibit is intended to encourage MEPs to look at developments since then and consider whether “political dialogue is actually influencing human rights” in Cuba.

Holy cow! Liberals and Democrats in EUROPE who get it? If only OUR liberals and Democrats would get it too.

Share
 

I was stark raving mad after reading a post titled Fear of repercussions by Henry “Conductor” Gomez on Babalu Blog this morning. Here’s why.

A few weeks back, the MSM was all atwitter over the announcement by the communist totalitarian state in Cuba that Castro would be strong enough to “run” for president again in 2008. I did a post on it on this blog.

This story inspired some of my fellow Cuban-American bloggers to start a presidential campaign on behalf of a true Cuban patriot, Dr. Oscar Elias Biscet, who also happens to be a political prisoner languishing in one of Castro’s hellholes.

When I first heard of this idea, I thought it was great. I had planned to add a graphic to this blog, but life sort of got in the way: I’ve been extraordinarily busy of late. So I never got around to doing it.

Understand, Dr. Biscet has no realistic hope of being elected president of Cuba, at least not so long as the Castro dictatorship remains in place. That said, the “Biscet in ’08″ campaign was, in my opinion and the opinion of other anti-Castro bloggers, a great way to publicize the plight of the Cuban people in general and Dr. Biscet in particular.

So, when I saw on Babalu Blog that a number of bloggers are dropping the idea of Dr. Biscet’s presidential campaign, I read on. The reason given was that Elsa Morejon, Dr. Biscet’s wife, had asked bloggers to end the campaign, out of fear of retaliation by Castro and his thugs. I understand and respect her concerns, for as Babalu Blog put it, “we can’t play with someone else’s skin.”

Now, that didn’t anger me, I can understand Elsa Morejon’s concerns. What really frosted my a** was the simple fact that we have to self-censor ourselves because of that bearded a-hole and what he might do to his prisoners. And by prisoners I don’t just mean the ones physically behind bars, I mean the 11 million living in the world’s largest open-air prison.

I’m a firm believer that everything in life happens for a reason. I can only imagine the reason Castro has lived so long is that each additional day he spends walking on this earth is one more day his special spot in hell is being made hotter.

Share
 

It’s April Fool’s Day today. So that must mean these Castro apologists are kidding, right?

From today’s Hartford (Connecticut) Courant:

That all changed after Fidel took the reins and shut down Mafia-owned casinos. American tourism dropped, but in 1970, groups of Connecticut students spent two-month stints in Cuba’s sugar fields, cutting cane in support of the revolution.

On one trip, Fidel worked side by side with six state residents, including a 24-year old named Guy. “He is someone who risked his life, was imprisoned and gave up a career as a lawyer to fight for his people. He can speak in the open in front of 1 million people … I’d like to see Richard Nixon do that,” the young Connecticut activist told a Courant reporter.

“Castro good, U.S. president bad,” said the young useful idiot.

Now, on to today’s Orlando Sentinel:

But Cuba has not remained exactly the same over the past decade and a half. The Castro regime promoted some significant liberalizing economic reforms around the mid-1990s, and its attitude toward internal dissent has alternated between periods of harsh crackdowns to others of greater tolerance.

A little repression, just a little, what’s so wrong with that?

Last but not least, today’s Miami Herald:

(U.S. Representative from Arizona Jeff) Flake said that while any travel, from anywhere, would inevitably send some funds Castro’s way, it would also do good by making it harder for him to isolate his society.

So, money makes the world go ’round, right Congresmman Flake? And why does a Congressman from Arizona care so much about Cuba?

A big “Thank you” to Marc Masferrer at Uncommon Sense and Henry “Conductor” Gomez at Babalu Blog for first blogging about these stories.

Share
 

The guys at Babalu blog published this morning an excellent but simple (sometimes those are the best) post about the whole Cuba spy thing. It’s mostly a series of links to a number of good articles on the topic, so rather than just rehash it here, I’ll just direct you there.

Don’t miss the comments, there are a number of good ones.

And now, for the “plus.” A few days ago, we posted about the so-called Cuban Five, the 5 spies Castro sent to the U.S. who were caught, convicted and thrown into prison, but which useful idiots around the world have made a cause celebre.

In doing research for that post, we found like a gazillion useful idiot websites that all said “Free the Five,” but very few dedicated to ensuring these five criminal spies remain where they belong: in prison, picking up the soap in the shower for Bubba.

Well, this inspired us to [SHAMELESS PLUG WARNING!!!] create a new website dedicated to just that. It’s called, appropriately enough, “Fry the Five.”

I don’t know how I find the time. But if you see me behind you during the morning commute on the Palmetto Expressway in Miami, be careful, I might not have had my coffee yet :-)

Share
 

One of our “friends” on the left has truly surprised me, pleasantly so. David Corn takes Ricardo Alarcon, AKA Fidel Castro’s parrot, to task for his hypocrisy in his blog on The Nation’s website:

… (Cuba’s National Assembly president and, as noted before, Castro parrot Ricardo) Alarcon’s concern for the plight of this one author is comical–in a dark fashion–for he heads a government that does not allow its citizens to challenge openly the conventional wisdom of the Castro regime. There is no free press in Alarcon’s country, no freedom of expression. There is no “passionate love of truth” among the rulers of Cuba. Alarcon is crying for (dead sociologist and pro-Castro author C. Wright) Mills, while his government does even worse to Cuban writers than the FBI did to Mills.

Holy imprisoned journalists, Batman, did David Corn just say that about Castro?

Yes, Robin, and there’s more:

For some “passionate truth” about the state of intellectual freedom within Cuba, let’s turn to the Committee To Protect Journalists’ most recent annual report on Cuba. (By the way, Nation publisher emeritus Victor Navasky is a CPJ board member.) The report notes that CPJ “named Cuba one of the world’s 10 Most Censored Countries.” It explains:

The government owns and controls all media outlets and restricts Internet access. The three main newspapers represent the views of the Communist Party and other organizations controlled by the government.

No freedom to write. No freedom to surf the Internet. And no freedom to report:

The media operate under the supervision of the Communist Party’s Department of Revolutionary Orientation, which develops and coordinates propaganda strategies. Those who try to work as independent reporters are harassed, detained, threatened with prosecution or jail, or barred from traveling. Their relatives are threatened with dismissal from their jobs. A small number of foreign correspondents report from Havana, but Cubans do not ever see their reports.

And what does Alarcon’s government do to brave souls who try to act as independent journalists? CPJ says:

Cuba continued to be one of the world’s leading jailers of journalists, second only to China. During 2006, two imprisoned journalists were released, but two more were jailed….

Of the 24 journalists who remained imprisoned, 22 were jailed in a massive March 2003 crackdown on the independent press. Their prison sentences on antistate charges ranged from 14 to 27 years. Many of them were jailed far from their homes, adding to the heavy burden on their families. Their families have described unsanitary prison conditions, inadequate medical care, and rotten food. Some imprisoned journalists were being denied religious guidance, and most shared cells with hardened criminals. Many were allowed family visits only once every three months and marital visits only once every four months–a schedule of visits far less frequent than those allowed most inmates. Relatives were harassed for talking to the foreign press and protesting the journalists’ incarceration.

Imagine a Cuban who wants to write and publish a Cuban version of The Power Elite. That person would be locked up in a modern-day dungeon by Alarcon and his comrades. Alarcon, thus, has no standing to bemoan the harassment of Mills or to pontificate about the glories of pursuing establishment-defying truths.

Now, naturally, Mr. Corn can’t let an opportunity to take a shot at President Bush pass without taking said shot:

Stating the obvious about the gross absence of political and human rights within Cuba should not be equated with support for the economic embargo maintained by the Bush administration against Cuba.

Nevertheless, it’s refreshing to read this type of stuff coming from the left.

Share
Mar 202007
 

A little more than a week ago, I posted on this blog that I had gone to the Lincoln Day dinner in Miami featuring former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney as keynote speaker. The day after, the Miami Herald ran a story about Governor Romney’s speech I thought was negative, especially having been at the event myself.

The Miami Herald ran another negative article about Governor Romney’s speech a couple of days ago (titled “Presidential candidate bungles speech in Miami“) and a post on this article at Babalu Blog brought about a heated debate in the comments section (disclaimer: I joined that discussion myself).

Today, the Boston Herald ran its own negative article on Governor Romney’s speech, titled “Mitt’s Commie phrase sparks rage.” The article was accompanied by a Photoshopped hack job of Governor Romney in Fidel Castro’s military fatigues and a cigar in his hand. This article was discussed on both Babalu Blog and Michelle Malkin’s blog.

As I noted before, I heard Governor Romney in person, along with my girlfriend and a few other good folks I know personally. While not everyone I know who went is thrilled with Governor Romney as a candidate, none of them were in a “rage,” nor did they “wince” at the Governor’s words. In fact, the vibe I felt in the room was a fairly upbeat, positive one.

The only conclusion I can draw about the negative coverage is the MSM’s bias against conservative Republicans. Having said that, yes, Governor Romney’s speech comes across as pandering to a degree. But what politician doesn’t pander? Mark my words, we’re going to see ALL of the serious presidential candidates drink the obligatory shot of Cuban coffee at Versailles during the next couple of years.

Share
© 2012 curioZities, LLC Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha